|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
First published on April 1, 2008, doi:10.1177/0022002707313305
Journal of Conflict Resolution 2008;52:479.
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2008
Fighting at Home, Fighting Abroad: How Civil Wars Lead to International Disputes
Kristian Skrede Gleditsch1*,
Idean Salehyan2,
and
Kenneth Schultz3
1 Department of Government, University of Essex, and Centre for the Study of Civil War, Oslo, Norway
2 Department of Political Science, University of North Texas, Denton
3 Department of Political Science, Stanford University, California
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ksg{at}essex.ac.uk.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Although research on conflict has tended to separately study interstate conflict and civil war, states experiencing civil wars are substantially more likely to become involved in militarized disputes with other states. Scholars have typically focused on opportunistic attacks or diversionary wars to explain this domestic–international conflict nexus. The authors argue that international disputes that coincide with civil wars are more often directly tied to the issues surrounding the civil war and emphasize intervention, externalization, and unintended spillover effects from internal conflict as important sources of international friction. They empirically demonstrate that civil wars substantially increase the probability of disputes between states. An analysis of conflict narratives shows that the increased risk of interstate conflict associated with civil wars is primarily driven by states efforts to affect the outcome of the civil war through strategies of intervention and externalization and not by an increase in conflicts over unrelated issues.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
|