This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0022002708318565v1 52/5/641    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Tir, J. Articles by Jasinski, M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Domestic-Level Diversionary Theory of War: Targeting Ethnic Minorities

¹ Department of International Affairs, University of Georgia, Athens
² Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tir{at}uga.edu.

	Abstract

According to the diversionary war theory, problematic domestic circumstances motivate a country’s leader to divert popular discontent by launching a militarized international crisis. Yet, empirical support for this argument has proved to be ambiguous at best. Relying on extant ethnic conflict research, we argue that the embattled leader can elicit public support by using armed force against ethnic minorities within his/her country. We call this option domestic diversion and argue that it is not only available to a larger number of leaders, but that it also often presents a less risky course of action than external diversion. Empirical tests of the domestic diversionary hypothesis show a connection between domestic problems facing the leader and the use of force against minorities. This finding provides a potentially new interpretation for the causes of some domestic conflicts, and suggests that the diversionary theory may operate on the domestic level of analysis.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?