|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
First published on June 6, 2008, doi:10.1177/0022002708318920
Journal of Conflict Resolution 2008;52:737.
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2008
Mediating the Mediation Debate: Conflict Resolution and the Local State in China
Benjamin L. Read1*
and
Ethan Michelson2
1 Department of Politics, University of California, Santa Cruz
2 Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: benjamin-read{at}uiowa.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Chinas elaborate system of local mediation committees has piqued researchers curiosity for decades and sparked an argument in these pages. Crucial questions—concerning how much mediation actually takes place, what kinds of disputes are mediated, who seeks mediation, and how successful it is—have gone unanswered for lack of data. This article addresses these issues using original surveys from Beijing and villages in six provinces, supplemented by participant-observation research on actual instances of mediation. We find that mediation is fairly common in the countryside while occurring in a narrow set of contexts in the city. Those who are actively involved in institutions of grassroots governance are much more likely than others to seek such remedies, and in rural China, women pursue it more than men do. Modernization may diminish the salience of this form of dispute resolution, yet it is far from extinct, even in contemporary society.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
|