This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fleishman, J. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effects of Decision Framing and Others' Behavior on Cooperation in a Social Dilemma

Department of Sociology, University of Maryland

In a decision situation, the choice alternatives can be described, or framed, with respect to different reference points, such as gains or losses. This study investigates the effects of decision framing in a social dilemma. Subjects, in groups of four or five persons, participated in a simulated social dilemma. Two factors were manipulated: decision framing (either in terms of giving to a collective good or taking from a collective good), and others' behavior (whether other group members had apparently cooperated a little or a great deal on the first trial). Subjects conformed to others' behavior when they could take from a collective good, but they diffused responsibility and acted contrary to others' behavior when they could give to a public good. These results imply that models of choice behavior in social dilemmas should be expanded to include framing effects, as well as other departures from strict rationality. Moreover, the results suggest that findings from social dilemma research in which subjects can contribute to buy a public good may not be consistent with findings from studies in which subjects can take resources from a common pool.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 32, No. 1, 162-180 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002788032001008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Dewulf, B. Gray, L. Putnam, R. Lewicki, N. Aarts, R. Bouwen, and C. van Woerkum Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective Human Relations, February 1, 2009; 62(2): 155 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Apesteguia and F. P. Maier-Rigaud The Role of Rivalry: Public Goods Versus Common-Pool Resources Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2006; 50(5): 646 - 663. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. De Cremer and E. van Dijk Perceived Criticality and Contributions in Public Good Dilemmas: A Matter of Feeling Responsible to all? Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2002; 5(4): 319 - 332. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Bartunek, K. E. Kram, R. Coffey, D. J. Lenn, M. K. Moch, and H. O'Neill A Group Mentoring Journey into the Department Chair Role Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 1997; 6(4): 270 - 279.

				T. H. Feeley, F. Tutzauer, H. L. Rosenfeld, and M. J. Young Cooperation in an Infinite-Choice Continuous-Time Prisoner's Dilemma Simulation Gaming, December 1, 1997; 28(4): 442 - 459. [Abstract]

				K. Aquino, V. Steisel, and A. Kay The Effects of Resource Distribution, Voice, and Decision Framing on the Provision of Public Goods Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 1992; 36(4): 665 - 687. [Abstract]

				W. C. McDaniel and F. Sistrunk Management Dilemmas and Decisions: Impact of Framing and Anticipated Responses Journal of Conflict Resolution, March 1, 1991; 35(1): 21 - 42. [Abstract]