This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Grobar, L. M. Articles by Porter, R. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Benoit Revisited:

Defense Spending and Economic Growth in LDCs

Richard C. Porter

Department of Economics, University of Michigan

In the early 1970s, Emile Benoit shocked development economists by presenting positive cross-country correlations between military expenditure rates and economic growth rates in less developed countries (LDCs). This article reviews the long debate that has followed. While the studies surveyed here differ widely in method and focus, the empirical results point to similar conclusions. First, efforts at re-estimating Benoit's correlation coefficients for different samples and different time periods all fail to reproduce Benoit's results. Second, while some studies uncover evidence of positive effects of military spending through human capital formation and technological "spin-off" effects, models that allow military spending to affect growth through multiple channels find that, while military spending may stimulate growth through some channels, it retards it through others, and the net effect is negative. The most important negative effect is that higher military spending reduces national saving rates, thereby reducing rates of capital accumulation.

The existence of positive effects of military spending on economic growth, as conjectured by Benoit, still cannot be ruled out. However, the recent econometric evidence points to the conclusion that these positive effects, if they exist, are small relative to the negative effects, and that, overall, military spending has a weak but adverse impact on economic growth in developing countries.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 33, No. 2, 318-345 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002789033002007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				U. Heo and S. D. Hahm Politics, Economics, and Defense Spending in South Korea Armed Forces & Society, July 1, 2006; 32(4): 604 - 622. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Antonakis Guns versus Butter: A Multisectoral Approach to Military Expenditure and Growth with Evidence from Greece, 1960-1993 Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 1999; 43(4): 501 - 520. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Antonakis Military Expenditure and Economic Growth in Greece, 1960-90 Journal of Peace Research, February 1, 1997; 34(1): 89 - 100. [Abstract]

				A. Mintz and R. T. Stevenson Defense Expenditures, Economic Growth, and The "Peace Dividend": A Longitudinal Analysis of 103 Countries Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 1995; 39(2): 283 - 305. [Abstract]

				K. R. DeRouen Jr. Arab-Israeli Defense Spending and Economic Growth Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 1995; 14(1): 25 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Y. Park `Pouring New Wine into Fresh Wineskins': Defense Spending and Economic Growth in LDCs with Application to South Korea Journal of Peace Research, February 1, 1993; 30(1): 79 - 93. [Abstract]

				A. R. Chowdhury A Causal Analysis of Defense Spending and Economic Growth Journal of Conflict Resolution, March 1, 1991; 35(1): 80 - 97. [Abstract]