Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marra, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Foreign Policy and Presidential Popularity

Creating Windows of Opportunity in the Perpetual Election

Robin F. Marra

Southern Methodist University

Charles W. Ostrom, Jr.

Michigan State University

Dennis M. Simon

Southern Methodist University

Variations in public support for the president have been explained in three different ways. First, approval has been viewed as controlled by the law of inevitable decline. Second, public support has been characterized as a function of an "environmental connection" between chief executives and macrofeatures of the political and economic landscape. Finally, some view "political drama" (e.g., speeches, trips, diplomatic agreements, and so on) as an important role in determining the popularity of the president. The present analysis offers a comprehensive model of public support for the president which draws on all three explanations and partitions the presidentially relevant factors into domestic and foreign policy subsets. The comprehensive model is operationalized and estimated using 573 Gallup presidential approval polls from January 1949 through December 1984. Empirical analysis demonstrated that factors derived from all three explanations contribute to the prediction of public support. In addition, the analysis evaluated the relative impact of domestic and foreign influences and located potential levers that presidents might pull to influence this popular support.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 34, No. 4, 588-623 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002790034004002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
G. T. Fox
Partisan Divide on War and the Economy: Presidential Approval of G. W. Bush
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2009; 53(6): 905 - 933.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
D. Brule
Congressional Opposition, the Economy, and U.S. Dispute Initiation, 1946-2000
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2006; 50(4): 463 - 483.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
G. E. Mcavoy
Stability and Change: The Time Varying Impact of Economic and Foreign Policy Evaluations on Presidential Approval
Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2006; 59(1): 71 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of International RelationsHome page
T. B. Pepinsky
From Agents to Outcomes: Simulation in International Relations
European Journal of International Relations, September 1, 2005; 11(3): 367 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
W. D. Baker and J. R. Oneal
Patriotism or Opinion Leadership?: The Nature and Origins of the "Rally 'Round the Flag" Effect
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2001; 45(5): 661 - 687.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
J. MEERNIK and M. AULT
Public Opinion and Support for U.S. Presidents' Foreign Policies
American Politics Research, July 1, 2001; 29(4): 352 - 373.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
K. Derouen Jr. and U K Heo
Defense Contracting and Domnestic Politics
Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2000; 53(4): 753 - 769.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
P. K. Huth
Major Power Intervention in International Crises, 1918-1988
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 1998; 42(6): 744 - 770.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. W. Knopf
Domestic Sources of Preferences for Arms Cooperation: The Impact of Protest
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 1998; 35(6): 677 - 695.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
D. A. Van Belle
Press Freedom and the Democratic Peace
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 1997; 34(4): 405 - 414.
[Abstract]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
J. Meernik and P. Waterman
The Myth of the Diversionary Use of Force by American Presidents
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 1996; 49(3): 573 - 590.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
K. R. DeRouen Jr.
The Indirect Link:: Politics, the Economy, and the Use of Force
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 1995; 39(4): 671 - 695.
[Abstract]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
J. M. Lindsay, L. W. Sayrs, and W. P. Steger
The Determinants of Presidential Foreign Policy Choice
American Politics Research, January 1, 1992; 20(1): 3 - 25.
[Abstract]