This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wittmer, J. M. Articles by Walker, M. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

General Alignment and Overt Support in Biased Mediation

Peter Carnevale

Michael E. Walker

University of Illinois

This experiment examined the influence of mediators' interests and outcome recommendations on disputants' perceptions and behavior. A distinction (following Pruitt, 1983) was made between two types of mediator bias: general alignment and overt support. In the general alignment variable, participants dealt with a mediator who was aligned either: (a) with them - mediator outcomes were positively correlated with their own, or (b) against them - mediator outcomes were negatively correlated with their own. In the overt support variable, participants were confronted with a mediator who made outcome recommendations that were overtly favorable, even handed, or unfavorable. The results indicate that disputants mistrusted favorable recommendations from unfavorably aligned mediators; this "Trojan horse effect" also led to lower ratings of mediator acceptability. The results suggest that favorable mediator alignment may cushion the impact of overt, unfavorable recommendations from that mediator. Broader theoretical and organizational implications are discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Bercovitch and A. Houston Why Do They Do It Like This?: An Analysis of the Factors Influencing Mediation Behavior in International Conflicts Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2000; 44(2): 170 - 202. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Arad and P. J. Carnevale Partisanship Effects in Judgments of Fairness and Trust in Third Parties in the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict Journal of Conflict Resolution, September 1, 1994; 38(3): 423 - 451. [Abstract]

				R. J. Leng Reciprocating Influence Strategies in Interstate Crisis Bargaining Journal of Conflict Resolution, March 1, 1993; 37(1): 3 - 41. [Abstract]