Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoover, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kowalewski, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dynamic Models of Dissent and Repression

Dean Hoover

David Kowalewski

Alfred University

The connection between dissent and repression has been the topic of much theory and empirical research, but little agreement on the relationship can be found. We reconceptualize the linkage in terms of an interactive process model of changes in the grievances and resourcemobilizations of dissident movement and regime countermovement. Diachronic modeling is proposed as superior to the cross-sectional approach for unraveling dissent-repression interactions. Dynamic modeling techniques are employed to experiment with three linear "mutuality models" using the scope and intensity dimensions of dissent and repression. Our findings reveal significant similarities and differences among the models studied that would be difficult to intuit from conventional methods. Dynamic modeling of complex rivalry relationships emerges as a potentially useful methodology for constructing effective policies of conflict resolution.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 36, No. 1, 150-182 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002792036001006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Political Research QuarterlyHome page
C. Davenport
The Weight of the Past: Exploring Lagged Determinants of Political Repression
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 1996; 49(2): 377 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
R. A. Francisco
The Relationship between Coercion and Protest: An Empirical Evaluation in Three Coercive States
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 1995; 39(2): 263 - 282.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
W. H. Moore
Action-Reaction or Rational Expectations?: Reciprocity and the Domestic-International Conflict Nexus during the "Rhodesia Problem"
Journal of Conflict Resolution, March 1, 1995; 39(1): 129 - 167.
[Abstract]

Home page
 International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
D. Kowalewski and D. Hoover
Dissent and Repression in the World-System: A Model of Future Dynamics
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, January 1, 1994; 35(3-4): 161 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]