Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, G. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Formal Framework for Mediator Mechanisms and Motivations

Sanda Kaufman

Cleveland State University

George T. Duncan

Carnegie Mellon University

A mediator aids disputants in resolving their differences. A theoretical framework for mediator mechanisms extends the subjective expected utility perspective and permits formal examination of mediator attitudes toward the equity and efficiency of agreements. Two forms of impartiality in promoting gains to disputants are examined: active (jointly motivated to help both disputants) and responsive (more motivated to help one disputant at higher payoff levels for the other). It is shown that (1) observed mediator activity to help only one disputant at some point in a dispute is not necessarily a sign of bias, and (2) active mediators seek efficient outcomes.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 36, No. 4, 688-708 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002792036004004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cooperation and ConflictHome page
Y.-C. Chang
Economic Interdependence and International Interactions: Impact of Third-Party Trade on Political Cooperation and Conflict
Cooperation and Conflict, June 1, 2005; 40(2): 207 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
J. A. Wall Jr., J. B. Stark, and R. L. Standifer
Mediation: A Current Review and Theory Development
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2001; 45(3): 370 - 391.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
J. Bercovitch and A. Houston
Why Do They Do It Like This?: An Analysis of the Factors Influencing Mediation Behavior in International Conflicts
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2000; 44(2): 170 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. Bercovitch and G. Schneider
Who Mediates? the Political Economy of International Conflict Management
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2000; 37(2): 145 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]