This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wallace, M. D. Articles by Thachuk, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Political Rhetoric of Leaders under Stress in the Gulf Crisis

Peter Suedfeld

University of British Columbia

Kimberley Thachuk

Simon Fraser University

The Gulf War and the crisis that led up to it provide an extremely useful laboratory for social scientists to test their hypotheses about crisis behavior. In this study the authors measure a structural attribute of leaders' utterances—their integrative complexity—before, during, and after the crisis and war to determine its association with behavior. They discovered that changes in integrative complexity provided a good early warning indicator of the Iraqi attack on Kuwait, and that later changes were closely associated with the fortunes of war for the Coalition and Iraqi forces. It was also found that "dovish" leaders showed higher levels of complexity than "hawkish" ones, that supreme commanders' utterances were less complex than those of their subordinates, and that complexity was not associated with region, language, or religion. Overall, the findings strongly confirm the general proposistion that reductions in the integrative complexity of leaders' communications provide a useful indicator of the presence of disruptive stress during a crisis.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 37, No. 1, 94-107 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002793037001004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Kemmelmeier and D. G. Winter Putting Threat into Perspective: Experimental Studies on Perceptual Distortion in International Conflict Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2000; 26(7): 795 - 809. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Satterfield Cognitive-Affective States Predict Military and Political Aggression and Risk Taking: A Content Analysis of Churchill, Hitler, Roosevelt, and Stalin Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 1998; 42(6): 667 - 690. [Abstract]

				K. Guttieri, M. D. Wallace, and P. Suedfeld The Integrative Complexity of American Decision Makers in The Cuban Missile Crisis Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 1995; 39(4): 595 - 621. [Abstract]

				S. G. Walker and G. L. Watson Integrative Complexity and British Decisions during the Munich and Polish Crises Journal of Conflict Resolution, March 1, 1994; 38(1): 3 - 23. [Abstract]