|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Situational Levers of Negotiating Flexibility
Daniel Druckman
National Research Council
The effects of a number of situational variables on decisions to be flexible or inflexible were explored in a simulation of an international negotiation on the regulation of gases contributing to the depletion of the ozone layer. Four negotiating-stage scenarios were created, each consisting of a particular combination of variables arranged into three experimental conditions. The experiment was run with two international samples, one consisting of scientists, the other of diplomats from different countries. The hypothesized differences among the conditions were obtained for both samples. Using a pair-comparisons format, participants were asked to judge the relative importance of the variables, within stages, in producing flexibility. Analyses of these judgments revealed trajectories of factors leading to agreement or to stalemate for both samples. These results were also compared with those obtained from a meta-analysis of earlier experiments examining similar variables. The simulation results, based on combined impacts of variables, were stronger than those obtained in the earlier experiments where variables were manipulated one at a time.
Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 37, No. 2,
236-276 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002793037002002

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Druckman and N. Ebner
Onstage or behind the scenes? Relative learning benefits of simulation role-play and design
Simulation Gaming,
December 1, 2008;
39(4):
465 - 497.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. C. Beardsley, D. M. Quinn, B. Biswas, and J. Wilkenfeld
Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
February 1, 2006;
50(1):
58 - 86.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Druckman
Turning Points in International Negotiation: A Comparative Analysis
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
August 1, 2001;
45(4):
519 - 544.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. I. SPECTOR
Negotiation Consulting: Applying Theory and Research to Practice
American Behavioral Scientist,
August 1, 2000;
43(10):
1681 - 1703.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Beriker and D. Druckman
Simulating the Lausanne Peace Negotiations, 1922-1923: Power Asymmetries in Bargaining
Simulation Gaming,
June 1, 1996;
27(2):
162 - 183.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. J. BARTOS
Modeling Distributive and Integrative Negotiations
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
November 1, 1995;
542(1):
48 - 60.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. DRUCKMAN
Situational Levers of Position Change: Further Explorations
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
November 1, 1995;
542(1):
61 - 80.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. I. SPECTOR
Creativity Heuristics for Impasse Resolution: Reframing Intractable Negotiations
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
November 1, 1995;
542(1):
81 - 99.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. PRUITT
Flexibility in Conflict Episodes
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
November 1, 1995;
542(1):
100 - 115.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. B. ATIYAS
Mediating Regional Conflicts and Negotiating Flexibility: Peace Efforts in Bosnia-Herzegovina
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
November 1, 1995;
542(1):
185 - 201.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
References for Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 25, No. 4
Simulation Gaming,
December 1, 1994;
25(4):
536 - 544.
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Druckman
Determinants of Compromising Behavior in Negotiation: A Meta-Analysis
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
September 1, 1994;
38(3):
507 - 556.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|