This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kramer, R. M. Articles by Newton, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Social Context of Negotiation

Effects of Social Identity and Interpersonal Accountability on Negotiator Decision Making

Pamela Pommerenke

Elizabeth Newton

Stanford University

The present research investigated the effects of social identification and interpersonal accountability on negotiator judgment and decision making. Using arguments derived from social identity theory, the authors hypothesized that salience of a common or shared social identity will heighten negotiators' concern about the other party's outcomes, resulting in a preference for greater equality. Extrapolating from recent research on the effects of accountability on judgment and decision making, they also argued that preference for equality of outcomes will be stronger when interpersonal accountability between negotiators is high. To investigate these hypotheses, the authors conducted a laboratory study. The study employed a 2 x 2 design, in which the salience of individuals' level of social identification (low versus high) and degree of interpersonal accountability (low versus high) was varied. The results supported both of the major hypotheses. The findings are discussed in terms of their implications for a social contextualist account of negotiator cognition and behavior. The authors argue that a social contextualist account sheds light on why negotiators' outcomes often deviate from those predicted by normative or rational models of bargaining.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 37, No. 4, 633-654 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002793037004003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. I. Swaab, K. W. Phillips, D. Diermeier, and V. Husted Medvec The Pros and Cons of Dyadic Side Conversations in Small Groups: The Impact of Group Norms and Task Type Small Group Research, June 1, 2008; 39(3): 372 - 390. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Yamagishi and N. Mifune Does Shared Group Membership Promote Altruism?: Fear, Greed, and Reputation Rationality and Society, February 1, 2008; 20(1): 5 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. K. W. De Dreu, B. A. Nijstad, and D. van Knippenberg Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 22 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Swaab, T. Postmes, I. van Beest, and R. Spears Shared Cognition as a Product of, and Precursor to, Shared Identity in Negotiations Pers Soc Psychol Bull, February 1, 2007; 33(2): 187 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. de Cremer How Self-Conception May Lead to Inequality: Effect of Hierarchical Roles on the Equality Rule in Organizational Resource-Sharing Tasks Group Organization Management, June 1, 2003; 28(2): 282 - 302. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. R. Smith, J. W. Jackson, and C. W. Sparks Effects of Inequality and Reasons for Inequality on Group Identification and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2003; 6(2): 201 - 220. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Kumar The Role of Affect in Negotiations: An Integrative Overview Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 1997; 33(1): 84 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]