Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bercovitch, J.
Right arrow Articles by Langley, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Nature of the Dispute and the Effectiveness of International Mediation

Jacob Bercovitch

Jeffrey Langley

University of Canterbury

The literature on mediation focuses largely on experimental laboratory studies or descriptions of single cases. This article goes beyond such approaches by analyzing systematically how dispute characteristics affect mediation outcomes. A theoretical framework for studying mediation behavior is developed and its central variables are evaluated against the mediation patterns of 97 international disputes in the postwar period. Using multivariate analysis and loglinear methods, the results indicate that dispute features such as fatalities, complexity, nature of the issue, and duration of dispute are most predictive of mediation outcomes. The authors use those results to specify a causal model that explains the data and to consider how best to evaluate the fit of alternative models of mediation to their data.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 37, No. 4, 670-691 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002793037004005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
M. T. Koch
Governments, Partisanship, and Foreign Policy: The Case of Dispute Duration
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2009; 46(6): 799 - 817.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
D. V. Frazier
Third Party Characteristics, Territory and the Mediation of Militarized Interstate Disputes
Conflict Management and Peace Science, September 1, 2006; 23(4): 267 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
K. C. Beardsley, D. M. Quinn, B. Biswas, and J. Wilkenfeld
Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2006; 50(1): 58 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cooperation and ConflictHome page
Y.-C. Chang
Economic Interdependence and International Interactions: Impact of Third-Party Trade on Political Cooperation and Conflict
Cooperation and Conflict, June 1, 2005; 40(2): 207 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
G. Schneider and U. S. Kramer
The Limitations of Fair Division: An Experimental Evaluation of Three Procedures
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2004; 48(4): 506 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
J. Bercovitch and K. Derouen Jr.
Mediation in Internationalized Ethnic Conflicts: Assessing the Determinants of a Successful Process
Armed Forces & Society, January 1, 2004; 30(2): 147 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
J. Wilkenfeld, K. Young, V. Asal, and D. Quinn
Mediating International Crises: Cross-National and Experimental Perspectives
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2003; 47(3): 279 - 301.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
D. Druckman
Turning Points in International Negotiation: A Comparative Analysis
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2001; 45(4): 519 - 544.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
K. Rasler
Shocks, Expectancy Revision, and the De-escalation of Protracted Conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian Case
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2000; 37(6): 699 - 720.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
R. Jackson
Successful Negotiation in International Violent Conflict
Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 2000; 37(3): 323 - 343.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
P. M. Regan
Substituting Policies during U.S. Interventions in Internal Conflicts: A Little of This, a Little of That
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2000; 44(1): 90 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
A.-K. Wickboldt, J. Bercovitch, and S. Piramuthu
Dynamics of International Mediation: Analysis Using Machine Learning Methods
Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 1999; 17(1): 49 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
P. F. Diehl, D. Druckman, and J. Wall
International Peacekeeping and Conflict Resolution: A Taxonomic Analysis with Implications
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 1998; 42(1): 33 - 55.
[Abstract]