This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Moore, W. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Action-Reaction or Rational Expectations?

Reciprocity and the Domestic-International Conflict Nexus during the "Rhodesia Problem"

University of California, Riverside

In this article, the author makes a case for expanding our focus from national-attribute studies of intranational conflict toward strategic behavior studies of intranational conflict. One payoff of such a move is that it enables us to specify a linkage between the strategic behavior of both domestic and international actors and thus address the often theorized, but rarely established, intranational-international conflict nexus. Further, the author takes a synthetic approach to the recent debate between action-reaction and rational expectations models of international conflict behavior and derives hypotheses concerning the behavior of both domestic and international parties to an armed intranational conflict. The hypotheses are then tested in a time-series case study design using the Rhodesian/Zimbabwean case for the period from 1957 to 1979. The results demonstrate that there existed an intranational-international conflict nexus in this case and highlight the utility of adopting a strategic behavior approach to studying armed intranational conflict.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 39, No. 1, 129-167 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002795039001006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Shellman, C. Hatfield, and M. J. Mills Disaggregating actors in intranational conflict Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2010; 47(1): 83 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. S. Gleditsch, I. Salehyan, and K. Schultz Fighting at Home, Fighting Abroad: How Civil Wars Lead to International Disputes Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2008; 52(4): 479 - 506. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. L. Thyne Cheap Signals with Costly Consequences: The Effect of Interstate Relations on Civil War Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2006; 50(6): 937 - 961. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. C. Carey The Dynamic Relationship Between Protest and Repression Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2006; 59(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Rasler and W. R. Thompson War, Trade, and the Mediation of Systemic Leadership Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 2005; 42(3): 251 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. H. Moore and S. M. Shellman Fear of Persecution: Forced Migration, 1952-1995 Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2004; 48(5): 723 - 745. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. REUVENY and W. R. THOMPSON World Economic Growth, Northern Antagonism, and North-south Conflict Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2002; 46(4): 484 - 514. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. H. Moore The Repression of Dissent: A Substitution Model of Government Coercion Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2000; 44(1): 107 - 127. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Reuveny and W. R. Thompson Economic Innovation, Systemic Leadership, and Military Preparations for War: The U.S. Case Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 1999; 43(5): 570 - 595. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. H. MOORE and D. R. DAVIS Ties that Bind?: Domestic and International Conflict Behavior in Zaire Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 1998; 31(1): 45 - 71. [Abstract]