Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saijo, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The "Spite" Dilemma in Voluntary Contribution Mechanism Experiments

Tatsuyoshi Saijo

University of Tsukuba, Osaka University

Hideki Nakamura

Fukushima University

This article explains deviations from formal expectations regarding choice behavior in settings where economic rationality (i.e., own payoff maximization) dictates either cooperating (full contribution) or free riding (no contribution) in the provision of public goods via the voluntary contribution mechanism. The authors find that the difference between full contribution and the observed level of contribution is greater than or equal to the corresponding difference when free riding is the best strategy. This surprising result is interpreted as the "spiteful" behavior of subjects whose first priority is not the total amount of payoff they receive but the ranking among them.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 39, No. 3, 535-560 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002795039003007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
E. Reuben and A. Riedl
Public Goods Provision and Sanctioning in Privileged Groups
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2009; 53(1): 72 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Finance ReviewHome page
J. C. Cox and V. Sadiraj
On Modeling Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods
Public Finance Review, March 1, 2007; 35(2): 311 - 332.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
U. Cress, J. Kimmerle, and F. W. Hesse
Information Exchange With Shared Databases as a Social Dilemma: The Effect of Metaknowledge, Bonus Systems, and Costs
Communication Research, October 1, 2006; 33(5): 370 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Theoretical PoliticsHome page
J. Bednar
Is Full Compliance Possible?: Conditions for Shirking with Imperfect Monitoring and Continuous Action Spaces
Journal of Theoretical Politics, July 1, 2006; 18(3): 347 - 375.
[Abstract] [PDF]