Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simon, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Starr, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Extraction, Allocation, and the Rise and Decline of States

A Simulation Analysis of Two-Level Security Management

Marc V. Simon

Bowling Green State University

Harvey Starr

University of South Carolina

Using realist models of international politics that deemphasize the two-level security game that states play, most analyses of hegemonic decline argue that decline is caused by the differential growth of power between hegemons and challenging states. The authors argue that decline is affected highly by states' resource extraction and allocation decisions, and that the international and domestic consequences of these decisions must be analyzed. A model of how states respond to external and internal security threats is outlined and analyzed via computer simulation. The authors find that states are likely to decline if they overemphasize increasing capabilities to deter threats instead of allocating resources to reduce opponents' willingness to attack. In addition, a more "dovish" allocation strategy can be very effective against internal threats. Thus the decline of hegemons and rise of challengers is determined as much by strategies as by constraints posed by the system structure.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 40, No. 2, 272-297 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002796040002003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
J. Meernik
A Supply and Demand Theory of US Military Policy
Conflict Management and Peace Science, February 1, 2008; 25(1): 33 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
R. J. Stoll
Civil Reality? Simulation Experiments on the Impact of Civil War in a Realist World
Conflict Management and Peace Science, February 1, 2005; 22(1): 19 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
G. Palmer and A. Bhandari
The Investigation of Substitutability in Foreign Policy
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2000; 44(1): 3 - 10.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
H. Starr
Substitutability in Foreign Policy: Theoretically Central, Empirically Elusive
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2000; 44(1): 128 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]