Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Tale of Two Democratic Peace Critiques

William R. Thompson

Department of Political Science, Indiana University

Richard Tucker

Center for International Affairs, Harvard University

Of approximately 100 empirical democratic peace articles published in journals and papers presented at conferences over the last 10 years, none identifies a positive and statistically significant relationship between democratic dyads and militarized conflict. Therefore, many international relations researchers have reached the conclusion that widespread democratization will lead to a more peaceful world. Nevertheless, two different attacks on these fundamental premises have been advanced recently. One argues that the pacificity of democratic dyads is restricted to the post-World War II era. The other argues that democratizing states, as opposed to states experiencing regime changes, have a greater propensity to engage in war. The present authors find that neither the arguments nor the evidence hold up well to closer scrutiny. First, when controlling for changes in specific predominant rivalry structures, pre-1914 democratic dyads are less likely to engage in militarized conflict. Second, democratic transitions do not produce a window of heightened vulnerability to war participation.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 41, No. 3, 428-454 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002797041003005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
R. Rauchhaus
Evaluating the Nuclear Peace Hypothesis: A Quantitative Approach
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2009; 53(2): 258 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
B. E. Goldsmith and Baogang He
Letting Go Without a Fight: Decolonization, Democracy and War, 1900--94
Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2008; 45(5): 587 - 611.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of International RelationsHome page
U. E. Daxecker
Perilous Polities? An Assessment of the Democratization-Conflict Linkage
European Journal of International Relations, December 1, 2007; 13(4): 527 - 553.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. Clare
Democratization and International Conflict: The Impact of Institutional Legacies
Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 2007; 44(3): 259 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
D. Sobek
Rallying Around the Podesta: Testing Diversionary Theory Across Time
Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2007; 44(1): 29 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
G. P. Herd and T. Tracy
Democratic Civil-Military Relations in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A New Paradigm for Protectorates?
Armed Forces & Society, July 1, 2006; 32(4): 549 - 565.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
T. Daubler
Debate: War and Post-Communist Democratization: Dealing with Old Comrade Endogeneity
Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2006; 43(1): 83 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
K. Rasler and W. R. Thompson
The Democratic Peace and a Sequential, Reciprocal, Causal Arrow Hypothesis
Comparative Political Studies, October 1, 2004; 37(8): 879 - 908.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
D. Sobek
Regime Type, Preferences, and War in Renaissance Italy
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2003; 47(2): 204 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
B. C. PRINS
Institutional Instability and the Credibility of Audience Costs: Political Participation and Interstate Crisis Bargaining, 1816-1992
Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2003; 40(1): 67 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
G. CHIOZZA
Is There a Clash of Civilizations? Evidence from Patterns of International Conflict Involvement, 1946-97
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2002; 39(6): 711 - 734.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
G. A. M. DAVIES
Domestic Strife and the Initiation of International Conflicts: A Directed Dyad Analysis, 1950-1982
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2002; 46(5): 672 - 692.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
W. J. DIXON and P. D. SENESE
Democracy, Disputes, and Negotiated Settlements
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2002; 46(4): 547 - 571.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
K. Rasler and W. R. Thompson
Rivalries and the Democratic Peace in the Major Power Subsystem
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2001; 38(6): 659 - 683.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
L.-E. Cederman
Modeling the Democratic Peace as a Kantian Selection Process
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2001; 45(4): 470 - 502.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. A. TURES
Democracies as Intervening States: A Critique of Kegley & Hermann
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2001; 38(2): 227 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. A. TURES
Addressing Concerns about Applying the Democratic Peace Arguments to Interventions
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2001; 38(2): 247 - 249.
[PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
S. Werner
The Effects of Political Similarity on the Onset of Militarized Disputes, 1816-1985
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 2000; 53(2): 343 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
B. Lai and D. Reiter
Democracy, Political Similarity, and International Alliances, 1816-1992
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2000; 44(2): 203 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
S. C. Zanger
A Global Analysis of the Effect of Political Regime Changes on Life Integrity Violations, 1977-93
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2000; 37(2): 213 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
M. Mousseau and Y. Shi
A Test for Reverse Causality in the Democratic Peace Relationship
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 1999; 36(6): 639 - 663.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
E. A. Henderson
Neoidealism and the Democratic Peace
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 1999; 36(2): 203 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
M. J. C. Crescenzi and A. J. Enterline
Ripples from the Waves? A Systemic, Time-Series Analysis of Democracy, Democratization, and Interstate War
Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 1999; 36(1): 75 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
A. J. Enterline
Regime Changes, Neighborhoods, and Interstate Conflict, 1816-1992
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 1998; 42(6): 804 - 829.
[Abstract]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
A. J. Enterline
Regime Changes and Interstate Conflict, 1816-1992
Political Research Quarterly, June 1, 1998; 51(2): 385 - 409.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. Mousseau
Democracy and Compromise in Militarized Interstate Conflicts, 1816-1992
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 1998; 42(2): 210 - 230.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
S. McLaughlin, S. Gates, H. Hegre, R. Gissinger, and N. P. Gleditsch
Timing the Changes in Political Structures: A new Polity Database
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 1998; 42(2): 231 - 242.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
A. Raknerud and H. Hegre
The Hazard of War: Reassessing the Evidence for the Democratic Peace
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 1997; 34(4): 385 - 404.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
W. R. Thompson and R. Tucker
Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered: A Reply to Farber and Gowa and to Mansfield and Snyder
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 1997; 41(3): 462 - 477.