Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bird, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sport as a Common Property Resource

A Solution to the Dilemmas of Doping

Edward J. Bird

Department of Political Science, University of Rochester

Gert G. Wagner

Department of Economics, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt/Oder

The use of drugs in high-performance sports (doping) is a common pool resource (CPR) dilemma: regardless of the number of other athletes who dope, the athlete with strong tastes for victory will find doping optimal; yet if all athletes dope, they all bear negative health consequences, although each one's odds of victory are not greatly changed. The current regulatory approach relies entirely on centralized bureaucratic methods and is ineffective. The authors use insights developed in the common property resource literature and the theory of social norms to analyze the failure of these methods. The programs they propose—the drug diary and a collegial enforcement system—are superior to the current system in that they encourage the development of athletic norms against unfair drug use. In the end, such norms are the only hope for controlling doping, which is becoming increasingly difficult to observe. Empirical evidence shows that such norms against unobservable sports violations can be very powerful. Norms of conduct in golf, for example, successfully enforce that sport's many rules regulating unobservable aspects of play.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 41, No. 6, 749-766 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002797041006002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sport and Social IssuesHome page
B. Stewart and A. C.T. Smith
Drug Use in Sport: Implications for Public Policy
Journal of Sport and Social Issues, August 1, 2008; 32(3): 278 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
N. Eber
The Performance-Enhancing Drug Game Reconsidered: A Fair Play Approach
Journal of Sports Economics, June 1, 2008; 9(3): 318 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
K. K. Haugen
The Performance-Enhancing Drug Game
Journal of Sports Economics, February 1, 2004; 5(1): 67 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
W. Maennig
On the Economics of Doping and Corruption in International Sports
Journal of Sports Economics, February 1, 2002; 3(1): 61 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
N. Eber
Credibility and Independence of the World Anti-Doping Agency: A Barro-Gordon-Type Approach to Antidoping Policy
Journal of Sports Economics, February 1, 2002; 3(1): 90 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]