This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jentleson, B. W. Articles by Britton, R. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Still Pretty Prudent

Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force

Rebecca L. Britton

Political Science Department, University of California, Davis

Extending and further testing the theory advanced by Bruce Jentleson with post-cold war data, variations in U.S. public support for the use of military force are shown to be best explained by the principal policy objective for which military force is being used, with a third category of "humanitarian intervention" added to the previous two of "foreign policy restraint" and "internal political change." The principal policy objective theory is shown through a series of tests, including regression and logistic analyses, to offer the most powerful and parsimonious explanation, both directly superseding and indirectly subsuming such other alternative variables as interests, elite cues, risk, and multilateralism. These findings support the broader theoretical view of a rational public purposive and not purely reactive in its opinion formulation and have important implications for the basic dispositions of the types of military interventions the American public will and will not support in the post-cold war era.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 42, No. 4, 395-417 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002798042004001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Groeling and M. A. Baum Journalists' Incentives and Media Coverage of Elite Foreign Policy Evaluations Conflict Management and Peace Science, November 1, 2009; 26(5): 437 - 470. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. L. Sullivan Sustaining the Fight: A Cross-Sectional Time-Series Analysis of Public Support for Ongoing Military Interventions Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 112 - 135. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Huddy, S. Feldman, and C. Weber The Political Consequences of Perceived Threat and Felt Insecurity The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November 1, 2007; 614(1): 131 - 153. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Bloch-Elkon Studying the Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy in International Crises: The United States and the Bosnian Crisis, 1992 1995 International Journal of Press/Politics, October 1, 2007; 12(4): 20 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. C. Rathbun Hierarchy and Community at Home and Abroad: Evidence of a Common Structure of Domestic and Foreign Policy Beliefs in American Elites Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2007; 51(3): 379 - 407. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Liberman Punitiveness and U.S. Elite Support for the 1991 Persian Gulf War Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2007; 51(1): 3 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Brule Congressional Opposition, the Economy, and U.S. Dispute Initiation, 1946-2000 Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2006; 50(4): 463 - 483. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Smith What Costs Will Democracies Bear? A Review of Popular Theories of Casualty Aversion Armed Forces & Society, July 1, 2005; 31(4): 487 - 512. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. E. Goldsmith, Y. Horiuchi, and T. Inoguchi American Foreign Policy and Global Opinion: Who Supported the War in Afghanistan? Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2005; 49(3): 408 - 429. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Souva Foreign Policy Determinants: Comparing Realist and Domestic-Political Models of Foreign Policy Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2005; 22(2): 149 - 163. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. L. Chapman and D. Reiter The United Nations Security Council and the Rally 'Round the Flag Effect Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2004; 48(6): 886 - 909. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. H. Lebovic Uniting for Peace?: Democracies and United Nations Peace Operations after the Cold War Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2004; 48(6): 910 - 936. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. A. Boettcher III Military Intervention Decisions Regarding Humanitarian Crises: Framing Induced Risk Behavior Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2004; 48(3): 331 - 355. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. D. Baker and J. R. Oneal Patriotism or Opinion Leadership?: The Nature and Origins of the "Rally 'Round the Flag" Effect Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2001; 45(5): 661 - 687. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. MEERNIK and M. AULT Public Opinion and Support for U.S. Presidents' Foreign Policies American Politics Research, July 1, 2001; 29(4): 352 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. A. Chanley U.S. Public Views of International Involvement from 1964 to 1993: Time-Series Analyses of General and Militant Internationalism Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 1999; 43(1): 23 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. W. Knopf How Rational Is "The Rational Public"?: Evidence from U.S. Public Opinion on Military Spending Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 1998; 42(5): 544 - 571. [Abstract]