This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by DiCicco, J. M. Articles by Levy, J. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Power Shifts and Problem Shifts

The Evolution of the Power Transition Research Program

Jack S. Levy

Department of Political Science, Rutgers University

This article analyzes the evolution of power transition theory from the perspective of Lakatos's methodology of scientific research programs. The authors reconstruct the development of the power transition research program by analyzing its hard core of irrefutable assumptions, its negative and positive heuristics, and exemplary works contributing to its protective belt of testable auxiliary hypotheses. It is argued that some developments (e.g., Lemke's multiple hierarchy model) constitute progressive problemshifts, but other areas of the research program exhibit signs of degeneration. These include the treatment of the timing and initiation of wars associated with power transitions and causal mechanisms driving such wars. Findings show that the evolution of the power transition research program has generally been progressive in Lakatosian terms, but its future vitality will require continued efforts to explain the above-mentioned theoretical and empirical anomalies in a way that is consistent with the hard core of the research program and that generates new testable propositions.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 43, No. 6, 675-704 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002799043006001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Bussmann and J. R. Oneal Do Hegemons Distribute Private Goods?: A Test of Power-Transition Theory Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2007; 51(1): 88 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. E. Goldsmith A Universal Proposition? Region, Conflict, War and the Robustness of the Kantian Peace European Journal of International Relations, December 1, 2006; 12(4): 533 - 563. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. KIM Power Parity, Alliance, Dissatisfaction, and Wars in East Asia, 1860-1993 Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2002; 46(5): 654 - 671. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. S. Geller Status Quo Orientation, Capabilities, and Patterns of War Initiation in Dyadic Rivalries Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 2000; 18(1): 73 - 96. [Abstract] [PDF]