Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Regan, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Substituting Policies during U.S. Interventions in Internal Conflicts

A Little of This, a Little of That

Patrick M. Regan

Department of Political Science, Binghamton University (State University of New York)

The conditions under which states substitute across a range of foreign policy options have remained largely an unexplored area of international relations. The ability to substitute policies is evident in the response by the United States to instability in other countries. In this article, the author explores the conditions under which the United States changes its intervention strategies in civil conflicts and the type of interventions that are substituted once the decision to change has been made. He argues that the decision to change policy is rooted in domestic political risks, while the specific strategy for intervening will be a function of capabilities. Using data on U.S. interventions in the post-World War II period, the author demonstrates that domestic factors are associated with the likelihood of a change from the status quo. The specific policy option chosen, however, appears to be a result of both capabilities, which are rooted in the relationship with the target country and the amount of public attention given to the conflict in the media.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 44, No. 1, 90-106 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002700044001005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
P. M. Regan, R. W. Frank, and A. Aydin
Diplomatic Interventions and Civil War: A New Dataset
Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 135 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
S. Suzuki, V. Krause, and J. D. Singer
The Correlates of War Project: a Bibliographic History of the Scientific Study of War and Peace, 1964-2000
Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 2002; 19(2): 69 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
D. H. Clark
Trading Butter for Guns: Domestic Imperatives for Foreign Policy Substitution
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2001; 45(5): 636 - 660.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
G. Palmer and A. Bhandari
The Investigation of Substitutability in Foreign Policy
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2000; 44(1): 3 - 10.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
H. Starr
Substitutability in Foreign Policy: Theoretically Central, Empirically Elusive
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2000; 44(1): 128 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]