Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bercovitch, J.
Right arrow Articles by Houston, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Why Do They Do It Like This?

An Analysis of the Factors Influencing Mediation Behavior in International Conflicts

Jacob Bercovitch

Allison Houston

Department of Political Science, University of Canterbury

Studies of international mediation traditionally have focused on the impact and effectiveness of mediation. This study examines mediator behavior and evaluates the factors that influence mediators' behavior and choice of strategies. Three contextual dimensions that exert influence on mediator behavior are preexisting factors (the conflict context and identity of the parties), concurrent factors (the identity of the mediator and actual mediation event), and background factors (the effect of information from previous mediation efforts). An original data set of 295 international conflicts from 1945 to 1995 is used to test a contingency model of mediation behavior. The results of a multivariate analysis suggest that the conditions of the mediation environment and the identity of the parties in conflict are the most significant influences on mediator's choice of strategy.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 44, No. 2, 170-202 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002700044002002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
D. V. Frazier
Third Party Characteristics, Territory and the Mediation of Militarized Interstate Disputes
Conflict Management and Peace Science, September 1, 2006; 23(4): 267 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
K. C. Beardsley, D. M. Quinn, B. Biswas, and J. Wilkenfeld
Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2006; 50(1): 58 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
L. G. Terris and Z. Maoz
Rational Mediation: A Theory and a Test
Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2005; 42(5): 563 - 583.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
P. A. Schrodt and D. J. Gerner
An Event Data Analysis of Third-Party Mediation in the Middle East and Balkans
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2004; 48(3): 310 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]