This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Goemans, H. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Fighting for Survival

The Fate of Leaders and the Duration of War

Department of Political Science, Duke University

This article examines how the postdefeat fate of leaders of different regimes affects their incentives to end or continue a losing war and how the outcome of war interacts with regime type to affect the leaders' postwar fate. Three regime types—democracies, dictatorships, and mixed regimes—and three fates—staying in power, losing power, and losing power with additional punishment in the form of exile, imprisonment, or death—are distinguished. Only leaders of mixed regimes are likely to lose power and suffer additional punishment whether they lose a war moderately or disastrously. Therefore, leaders of such losing mixed regimes have a disincentive to settle on moderately losing terms; they prefer to continue war in a gamble for resurrection. As a result, wars with losing mixed regimes last longer and produce higher numbers of battle deaths for both sides than other wars.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 44, No. 5, 555-579 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002700044005001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. A. Stanley and J. P. Sawyer The Equifinality of War Termination: Multiple Paths to Ending War Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2009; 53(5): 651 - 676. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. E. Goemans, K. S. Gleditsch, and G. Chiozza Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2009; 46(2): 269 - 283. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Z. Iqbal and C. Zorn The Political Consequences of Assassination Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2008; 52(3): 385 - 400. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Mattes and T. C. Morgan When Do They Stop? Modeling the Termination of War Conflict Management and Peace Science, July 1, 2004; 21(3): 179 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. McGillivray and A. C. Stam Political Institutions, Coercive Diplomacy, and the Duration of Economic Sanctions Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2004; 48(2): 154 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Lebo and W. H. Moore Dynamic Foreign Policy Behavior Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2003; 47(1): 13 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, D. Reiter, and C. Zorn Nonproportional Hazards and Event History Analysis in International Relations Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2003; 47(1): 33 - 53. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. A. Schultz Looking for Audience Costs Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2001; 45(1): 32 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF]