This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bennett, D. S. Articles by Stam, A. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Research Design and Estimator Choices in the Analysis of Interstate Dyads

When Decisions Matter

Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University

Allan C. Stam

Government Department, Dartmouth College

Researchers face three basic questions when testing theoretically driven hypotheses. First is research design: for example, what population should be analyzed, what sample should be drawn from that population, and what cases should be excluded from the sample? What statistical estimator should one use? What set of control variables should one employ? Results drawn from several permutations of the Correlates of War Militarized Interstate Dispute data set are compared using three statistical models. For some theories and variables (international institutionalism—intergovernmental organization and alliance membership; realism—balance of power; expected utility theory—international interaction game equilibria), research design and estimator choices substantially influence the findings. For others (trade and democratic peace theory), the relationship between the dependent and independent variables is relatively impervious to research design and estimator choices.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 44, No. 5, 653-685 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002700044005005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L. Quackenbush and M. Rudy Evaluating the Monadic Democratic Peace Conflict Management and Peace Science, July 1, 2009; 26(3): 268 - 285. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Gartzke and D.-J. Jo Bargaining, Nuclear Proliferation, and Interstate Disputes Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2009; 53(2): 209 - 233. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Hegre Trade Dependence or Size Dependence?: The Gravity Model of Trade and the Liberal Peace Conflict Management and Peace Science, February 1, 2009; 26(1): 26 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Hegre Gravitating toward War: Preponderance May Pacify, but Power Kills Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2008; 52(4): 566 - 589. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. R. Boehmer A Reassessment of Democratic Pacifism at the Monadic Level of Analysis Conflict Management and Peace Science, February 1, 2008; 25(1): 81 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Filson and S. Werner Sensitivity to Costs of Fighting versus Sensitivity to Losing the Conflict: Implications for War Onset, Duration, and Outcomes Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2007; 51(5): 691 - 714. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Ashley Leeds and M. Mattes Alliance Politics during the Cold War: Aberration, New World Order, or Continuation of History? Conflict Management and Peace Science, July 1, 2007; 24(3): 183 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. S. Bennett Exploring Operationalizations of Political Relevance Conflict Management and Peace Science, July 1, 2006; 23(3): 245 - 261. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. M. Hafner-Burton and A. H. Montgomery Power Positions: International Organizations, Social Networks, and Conflict Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2006; 50(1): 3 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L. Quackenbush Identifying Opportunity for Conflict: Politically Active Dyads Conflict Management and Peace Science, February 1, 2006; 23(1): 37 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lagazio and T. Marwala Assessing Different Bayesian Neural Network Models for Militarized Interstate Dispute: Outcomes and Variable Influences Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2006; 24(1): 119 - 131. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Lee Ray Constructing Multivariate Analyses (of Dangerous Dyads) Conflict Management and Peace Science, September 1, 2005; 22(4): 277 - 292. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Oneal and B. Russett Rule of Three, Let It Be? When More Really Is Better Conflict Management and Peace Science, September 1, 2005; 22(4): 293 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. M. Kim and D. L. Rousseau The Classical Liberals Were Half Right (or Half Wrong): New Tests of the 'Liberal Peace', 1960-88 Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2005; 42(5): 523 - 543. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Hegre Identifying How Trade Matters in Empirical Studies of Interstate Conflict Conflict Management and Peace Science, July 1, 2005; 22(3): 217 - 224. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Buhaug Dangerous Dyads Revisited: Democracies May Not Be That Peaceful After All Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2005; 22(2): 95 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Croco and T. K. Teo Assessing the Dyadic Approach to Interstate Conflict Processes: A.k.a. "Dangerous" Dyad-Years Conflict Management and Peace Science, February 1, 2005; 22(1): 5 - 18. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. S. Sechser Are Soldiers Less War-Prone than Statesmen? Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2004; 48(5): 746 - 774. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Hegre Size Asymmetry, Trade, and Militarized Conflict Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2004; 48(3): 403 - 429. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Gartzke and Q. Li Measure for Measure: Concept Operationalization and the Trade Interdependence-Conflict Debate Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2003; 40(5): 553 - 571. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Chiozza and H. E. Goemans Peace through Insecurity: Tenure and International Conflict Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2003; 47(4): 443 - 467. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Mousseau, H. Hegre, and J. R. O'neal How the Wealth of Nations Conditions the Liberal Peace European Journal of International Relations, June 1, 2003; 9(2): 277 - 314. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. C. PRINS Institutional Instability and the Credibility of Audience Costs: Political Participation and Interstate Crisis Bargaining, 1816-1992 Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2003; 40(1): 67 - 84. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. K. HUTH and T. L. ALLEE Domestic Political Accountability and the Escalation and Settlement of International Disputes Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2002; 46(6): 754 - 790. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. M. E. JUNGBLUT and R. J. STOLL The Liberal Peace and Conflictive Interactions: The Onset of Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1950-78 Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2002; 39(5): 527 - 546. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. D. Mansfield and B. M. Pollins The Study of Interdependence and Conflict: Recent Advances, Open Questions, and Directions for Future Research Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2001; 45(6): 834 - 859. [Abstract] [PDF]