Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Dataset
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NACHTWEY, J.
Right arrow Articles by TESSLER, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Political Economy of Attitudes toward Peace among Palestinians and Israelis

JODI NACHTWEY

Department of Political Science University of Michigan

MARK TESSLER

Department of Political Science University of Michigan

This study evaluates the degree to which economic evaluations help to explain attitudes toward peace among Palestinians and Israelis in the years following the 1993 Oslo accords. It first applies insights from political science and economics to the Israeli-Palestinian context, deriving hypotheses that are then tested using survey data from Israel and Palestine (West Bank and Gaza) collected between 1996 and 2001. Findings show that economic orientations have both a direct and indirect impact on attitudes toward negotiations and compromise. On one hand, economic evaluations are directly related to foreign policy attitudes through what appear to be cost-benefit calculations regarding the expected economic consequences of peace. Economic judgments also influence attitudes toward peace indirectly by contributing to levels of confidence in political leaders, which in turn influence the way that citizens assess the peace negotiations in which their leaders are engaged.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 46, No. 2, 260-285 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002702046002005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
I. Maoz and C. McCauley
Threat, Dehumanization, and Support for Retaliatory Aggressive Policies in Asymmetric Conflict
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2008; 52(1): 93 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. Tessler and M. D. H. Robbins
What Leads Some Ordinary Arab Men and Women to Approve of Terrorist Acts Against the United States?
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2007; 51(2): 305 - 328.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
G. Friedman
Commercial Pacifism and Protracted Conflict: Models from the Palestinian-Israeli Case
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2005; 49(3): 360 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]