Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Dataset
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BEARCE, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by FISHER, E. ON.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Economic Geography, Trade, and War

DAVID H. BEARCE

Department of Political Science University of Pittsburgh

ERIC O'N. FISHER

Department of Economics The Ohio State University

An agent-based model in which economic exchange and military conflict are emergent processes is used to explore the relationship between trade and war. The model of exchange is an applied analysis of the economics of trading networks. The model of conflict treats war as a breakdown in interstate bargaining due to incomplete information. The simulations explore how initial economic geography, state revisionism, defensive advantage, and technological advancement akin to globalization affect both trade and war. The results show that the relationship between trade and war depends on third factors, and an inverse relationship between trade and war emerges from compact geographies with revisionist states.

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 46, No. 3, 365-393 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002702046003003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
M. A. Benson
The Relevance of Politically Relevant Dyads in the Study of Interdependence and Dyadic Disputes
Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2005; 22(2): 113 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. R. Oneal
Measuring Interdependence and Its Pacific Benefits: A Reply to Gartzke & Li
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2003; 40(6): 721 - 725.
[Abstract] [PDF]