Journal of Conflict Resolution

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Box-Steffensmeier, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zorn, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 47, No. 1, 33-53 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002702239510

Nonproportional Hazards and Event History Analysis in International Relations

Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier,

Department of Political Science Ohio State University

Dan Reiter,

Christopher Zorn,

Department of Political Science Emory University

Event history models have become a dominant method of analysis in the study of international relations. Conventional event history models, however, retain the assumption that the effects of the covariates remain proportional to each other throughout the duration of the subject's phase. Nonproportional hazard (NPH) models are used, which allow for the effects of covariates to vary over time. These models are then applied to three previously established data sets on the duration of postwar peace, civil wars, and alliances. Results show that NPH analysis is a useful method for testing new hypotheses, as well as removing possible sources of bias from existing analyses.

Key Words: proportional hazards • Cox model • peace • civil wars • alliances


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
D. Balch-Lindsay, A. J. Enterline, and K. A. Joyce
Third-Party Intervention and the Civil War Process
Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 2008; 45(3): 345 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
G. Schneider and N. Wiesehomeier
Rules That Matter: Political Institutions and the Diversity--Conflict Nexus
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 183 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
J. Golub
Survival Analysis and European Union Decision-making
European Union Politics, June 1, 2007; 8(2): 155 - 179.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
P. M. Regan and A. Aydin
Diplomacy and Other Forms of Intervention in Civil Wars
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2006; 50(5): 736 - 756.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
A. Smith and A. C. Stam
Bargaining and the Nature of War
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2004; 48(6): 783 - 813.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
S. A. Bremer, P. M. Regan, and D. H. Clark
Building a Science of World Politics: Emerging Methodologies And The Study Of Conflict
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2003; 47(1): 3 - 12.
[PDF]