Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Dataset
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gleditsch, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Beardsley, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Nosy Neighbors

Third-Party Actors in Central American Conflicts

Kristian Skrede Gleditsch

Department of Political Science University of California, San Diego, kgleditsch{at}ucsd.edu

Kyle Beardsley

Department of Political Science University of California, San Diego

Scholars argue that third parties make rational calculations and intervene to influence interstate dispute outcomes in favor of their own objectives. Third parties affect not only conflict outcomes but also escalation and duration. Theories of third-party involvement are applied to understand the dynamics of intrastate war. An analysis of event data for three Central American conflicts (El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua) from 1984 to 2001 is used to examine transnational actors’ influence on the dynamics of civil war. Findings show that transnational third parties often alter levels of cooperation among domestic adversaries, and that consistency affects the strength and direction of third-party influence.

Key Words: civil war • transnational dimensions • third parties • mediation • automated event data

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 48, No. 3, 379-402 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002704263710


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
M. Bosker and H. Garretsen
Economic development and the geography of institutions
J. Econ. Geogr., May 1, 2009; 9(3): 295 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
K. S. Gleditsch, I. Salehyan, and K. Schultz
Fighting at Home, Fighting Abroad: How Civil Wars Lead to International Disputes
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2008; 52(4): 479 - 506.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
G. A.M. Davies
Strategic Cooperation, the Invasion of Iraq and the Behaviour of the `Axis of Evil', 1990--2004
Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 2008; 45(3): 385 - 399.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
INT RELAT ASIA PACHome page
G. A.M. Davies
US Presidential popularity and opportunities to coerce North Korea: a quantitative test 1990 2000
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, May 1, 2007; 7(2): 129 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
C. L. Thyne
Cheap Signals with Costly Consequences: The Effect of Interstate Relations on Civil War
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2006; 50(6): 937 - 961.
[Abstract] [PDF]