| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Understanding Covert Repressive ActionThe Case of the U.S. Government against the Republic of New AfricaDepartment of Political Science University of Maryland Although overt repression has been studied extensively (e.g., mass arrests), there have been no rigorous investigations of covert repressive action (CRA; e.g., electronic and physical surveillance). To better understand the latter behavior, the author uses newdata about U.S. domestic intelligence activity directed against a Black Nationalist organization in Detroit, Michigan, during the late 1960s and early 1970s (N= 3,136, by neighborhood-month). In line with existing research, evidence reveals that CRA responds to dissent, lagged repression, and the level of economic development within a neighborhood. Differing from existing literature, however, results also disclose thatCRAresponds to where dissidents live and, most important, in accordance to the racial characteristics of the neighborhood within which potential targets are located. Wiretaps and tails are thus prompted by numerous factors, but the identity of challengers (i.e., political "profiling") proves to be an essential part of the explanation.
Key Words: Republic of New Africa • covert action • repression • African Americans • social movements • human rights violation • protest policing
Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 49, No. 1,
120-140 (2005) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
