Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heal, G.
Right arrow Articles by Kunreuther, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

IDS Models of Airline Security

Geoffrey Heal

Graduate School of Business and the School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University

Howard Kunreuther

Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

This article applies an earlier analysis of interdependent security issues to a general class of problems involving discrete interdependent exposure to terrorist risks. Any agent’s incentive to adopt risk-reducing measures depends on the actions of others because of the negative externalities created by not investing in protection. Using airline security as an illustrative example, the authors show that any individual airline will be less likely to invest in security measures as more firms in the industry also fail to invest. For a wide range of parameters, both individual airline and total industry profits can be significantly improved by everyone investing in security. The article discusses the role that private trade associations as well as public-sector actions such as taxes, subsidies, and regulations can play in dealing with the negative externalities caused by interdependent security. The article concludes with suggestions for future research.

Key Words: Nash equilibrium • tipping • cascading • terrorism • security • interdependence

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 49, No. 2, 201-217 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002704272833


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Simulation GamingHome page
T. Sandler and K. Siqueira
Games and Terrorism: Recent Developments
Simulation Gaming, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 164 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
D. Jacobson and E. H. Kaplan
Suicide Bombings and Targeted Killings in (Counter-) Terror Games
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2007; 51(5): 772 - 792.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
B. P. Rosendorff and T. Sandler
The Political Economy of Transnational Terrorism
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2005; 49(2): 171 - 182.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
D. G. A. M. and T. Sandler
Counterterrorism: A Game-Theoretic Analysis
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2005; 49(2): 183 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]