This Article Full Text (PDF) Dataset References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fearon, J. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Primary Commodity Exports and Civil War

Department of Political Science, Stanford University

Collier and Hoeffler reported that countries with a higher percentage of national income from primary commodity exports have been more prone to civil war, an interesting finding that has received much attention from policy makers and the media. The author shows that this result is quite fragile, even using Collier and Hoeffler’s data. Minor changes in the sample framing and the recovery of missing data undermine it. To the extent that there is an association, it is likely because oil is a major component of primary commodity exports and substantial oil production does associate with civil war risk. The author argues that oil predicts civil war risk not because it provides an easy source of rebel start-up finance but probably because oil producers have relatively low state capabilities given their level of per capita income and because oil makes state or regional control a tempting "prize." An analysis of data on government observance of contracts and investor-perceived expropriation risk is consistent with this hypothesis.

Key Words: civil war • natural resources • oil • rebel finance

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Collier, A. Hoeffler, and D. Rohner Beyond greed and grievance: feasibility and civil war Oxf. Econ. Pap., August 24, 2008; (2008) gpn029v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Oyefusi Oil and the Probability of Rebel Participation Among Youths in the Niger Delta of Nigeria Journal of Peace Research, July 1, 2008; 45(4): 539 - 555. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Aspinall The Construction of Grievance: Natural Resources and Identity in a Separatist Conflict Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2007; 51(6): 950 - 972. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Buhaug Relative Capability and Rebel Objective in Civil War Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2006; 43(6): 691 - 708. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Snyder Does Lootable Wealth Breed Disorder?: A Political Economy of Extraction Framework Comparative Political Studies, October 1, 2006; 39(8): 943 - 968. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Ron Paradigm in Distress?: Primary Commodities and Civil War Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2005; 49(4): 443 - 450. [PDF]

				T. Dunning Resource Dependence, Economic Performance, and Political Stability Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2005; 49(4): 451 - 482. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Humphreys Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution: Uncovering the Mechanisms Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2005; 49(4): 508 - 537. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Lujala, N. P. Gleditsch, and E. Gilmore A Diamond Curse?: Civil War and a Lootable Resource Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2005; 49(4): 538 - 562. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Collier and A. Hoeffler Resource Rents, Governance, and Conflict Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2005; 49(4): 625 - 633. [Abstract] [PDF]