This Article Full Text (PDF) Dataset References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Humphreys, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution

Uncovering the Mechanisms

Department of Political Science, Columbia University

The interpretation of the resource-conflict link that has become most publicized—the rebel greed hypothesis—depends on just one of many plausible mechanisms that could underlie a relationship between resource dependence and violence. The author catalogues a large range of rival possible mechanisms, highlights a set of techniques that may be used to identify these mechanisms, and begins to employ these techniques to distinguish between rival accounts of the resource-conflict linkages. The author uses finer natural resource data than has been used in the past, gathering and presenting new data on oil and diamonds production and on oil stocks. The author finds evidence that (1) conflict onset is more responsive to the impacts of past natural resource production than to the potential for future production, supporting a weak states mechanism rather than a rebel greed mechanism; (2) the impact of natural resources on conflict cannot easily be attributed entirely to the weak states mechanism, and in particular, the impact of natural resources is independent of state strength; (3) the link between primary commodities and conflict is driven in part by agricultural dependence rather than by natural resources more narrowly defined, a finding consistent with a "sparse networks" mechanism; (4) natural resources are associated with shorter wars, and natural resource wars are more likely to end with military victory for one side than other wars. This is consistent with evidence that external actors have incentives to work to bring wars to a close when natural resource supplies are threatened. The author finds no evidence that resources are associated with particular difficulties in negotiating ends to conflicts, contrary to arguments that loot-seeking rebels aim to prolong wars.

Key Words: civil war • resource-conflict link • resource dependence

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. M. Jensen and D. J. Young A Violent Future? Political Risk Insurance Markets and Violence Forecasts Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2008; 52(4): 527 - 547. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Oyefusi Oil and the Probability of Rebel Participation Among Youths in the Niger Delta of Nigeria Journal of Peace Research, July 1, 2008; 45(4): 539 - 555. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Gerring Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method? Comparative Political Studies, March 1, 2007; 40(3): 231 - 253. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Snyder Does Lootable Wealth Breed Disorder?: A Political Economy of Extraction Framework Comparative Political Studies, October 1, 2006; 39(8): 943 - 968. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Ron Paradigm in Distress?: Primary Commodities and Civil War Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2005; 49(4): 443 - 450. [PDF]

				T. Dunning Resource Dependence, Economic Performance, and Political Stability Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2005; 49(4): 451 - 482. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Fearon Primary Commodity Exports and Civil War Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2005; 49(4): 483 - 507. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Lujala, N. P. Gleditsch, and E. Gilmore A Diamond Curse?: Civil War and a Lootable Resource Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2005; 49(4): 538 - 562. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Snyder and R. Bhavnani Diamonds, Blood, and Taxes: A Revenue-Centered Framework for Explaining Political Order Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2005; 49(4): 563 - 597. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Collier and A. Hoeffler Resource Rents, Governance, and Conflict Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2005; 49(4): 625 - 633. [Abstract] [PDF]