Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Dataset
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eichenberg, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lebo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

War President

The Approval Ratings of George W. Bush

Richard C. Eichenberg

Department of Political Science, Tufts University

Richard J. Stoll

Department of Political Science, Rice University

Matthew Lebo

Department of Political Science, Stony Brook University

The authors estimate a model of the job approval ratings of President George W. Bush that includes five sets of variables: a "honeymoon" effect, an autoregressive function that tracks a decline in approval, measures of economic performance, measures of important "rally events," and a measure of the costs of war—in this case, the U.S. death toll in the Iraq War. Several significant effects are found, including the rally that followed the attacks of September 11, 2001; the commencement of the war in Iraq; and the capture of Baghdad in April 2003. Since the beginning of the war in Iraq, however, the casualties of war have had a significant negative impact on Bush’s approval ratings. Although the effects of additional battle deaths in Iraq will decrease approval only marginally, results suggest that there is also little prospect for sustained improvement so long as casualties continue to accumulate.

Key Words: George W. Bush • approval ratings • Iraq War

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 50, No. 6, 783-808 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002706293671


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
W. A. Boettcher III and M. D. Cobb
"Don't Let Them Die in Vain": Casualty Frames and Public Tolerance for Escalating Commitment in Iraq
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2009; 53(5): 677 - 697.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of International RelationsHome page
B. M. Russett
Democracy, War and Expansion through Historical Lenses
European Journal of International Relations, March 1, 2009; 15(1): 9 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PubliusHome page
B. T. Gomez and J. M. Wilson
Political Sophistication and Attributions of Blame in the Wake of Hurricane Katrina
Publius, September 1, 2008; 38(4): 633 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
P. L. Sullivan
Sustaining the Fight: A Cross-Sectional Time-Series Analysis of Public Support for Ongoing Military Interventions
Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 112 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
E. Voeten and P. R. Brewer
Public Opinion, the War in Iraq, and Presidential Accountability
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2006; 50(6): 809 - 830.
[Abstract] [PDF]