This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Konrad, K. A. Articles by Skaperdas, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Succession Rules and Leadership Rents

Department of Economics Free University of Berlin and Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB)

Stergios Skaperdas

Department of Economics University of California, Irvine

Leaders compensate supporters not just for performing their duties but also to preempt an overthrow by the same supporters. We show how succession rules affect the power of leaders relative to supporters as well as the resources expended on possible succession struggles. We compare two regimes of leadership succession: the conclave regime and the divide-et-impera regime, which differ with respect to the role of supporters of the previous leader once the new leader takes power. The leadership rent is higher, and supporters receive a lower compensation in the divide-et-impera regime, as supporters have to fight harder for succession to avoid the grim outcome of loss. A leader, then, would like to induce the divide-et-impera regime even when every supporter has veto power over her leadership.

Key Words: political leadership • political support • political survival • successorship

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 51, No. 4, 622-645 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002707302799


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?