Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Set
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mansfield, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Pevehouse, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Democratization and the Varieties of International Organizations

Edward D. Mansfield

Department of Political Science University of Pennsylvania

Jon C. Pevehouse

Harris School of Public Policy University of Chicago

Scholars of international relations have devoted remarkably little attention to the issue of why and when states enter international organizations (IOs). We argue that states have particular reason to enter IOs during the process of democratization. In the midst of a democratic transition, state leaders have difficulty making a credible commitment to sustain reforms, since they can benefit from rolling back liberalization. Gaining membership in an IO can enhance the credibility of leaders' commitments to democratic reforms. However, not all IOs are equally useful in this regard. We distinguish between IOs that cover standards in areas such as human rights and environmental protection, those that regulate economic activity, and those that are forums for addressing broad political problems. We argue that democratizing states have greater reason to join standards-based and economic IOs than political organizations. The results of a set of statistical tests support this argument.

Key Words: democratization • international organizations • international institutions • democracy

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 52, No. 2, 269-294 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002707313691
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
H. Dorussen and H. Ward
Intergovernmental Organizations and the Kantian Peace: A Network Perspective
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 189 - 212.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
J. von Stein
The International Law and Politics of Climate Change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 243 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
H. E. Hansen, S. McLaughlin Mitchell, and S. C. Nemeth
IO Mediation of Interstate Conflicts: Moving Beyond the Global versus Regional Dichotomy
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 295 - 325.
[Abstract] [PDF]