Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Set
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vreeland, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effect of Political Regime on Civil War

Unpacking Anocracy

James Raymond Vreeland

Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

Research published in the American Political Science Review shows that anocracies—as defined by the middle of the Polity index of political regime—are more susceptible to civil war than are either pure democracies or pure dictatorships. Yet, certain components of the Polity index include a factional category, where political competition is ``intense, hostile, and frequently violent. Extreme factionalism may be manifested in the establishment of rival governments and in civil war'' (Gurr 1989, 12). Not surprisingly, these components exhibit a strong relationship with civil war. When they are removed from the Polity index, however, the original relationship disappears. I conclude that the original finding is not driven by the relationship between political institutions and civil war but rather by a less provocative relationship between political violence and civil war.

Key Words: civil war • Polity • anocracy • political regime measurement

Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 52, No. 3, 401-425 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002708315594


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
A. C. Garriga
Regime Type and Bilateral Treaty Formalization: Do Too Many Cooks Spoil the Soup?
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2009; 53(5): 698 - 726.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
H. Buhaug, S. Gates, and P. Lujala
Geography, Rebel Capability, and the Duration of Civil Conflict
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2009; 53(4): 544 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
L.-E. Cederman, H. Buhaug, and J. K. Rod
Ethno-Nationalist Dyads and Civil War: A GIS-Based Analysis
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2009; 53(4): 496 - 525.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of International RelationsHome page
B. M. Russett
Democracy, War and Expansion through Historical Lenses
European Journal of International Relations, March 1, 2009; 15(1): 9 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
T. Edward Flores and I. Nooruddin
Democracy under the Gun Understanding Postconflict Economic Recovery
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2009; 53(1): 3 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]