This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Data Set All Versions of this Article: 0022002707310855v1 52/3/385    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Iqbal, Z. Articles by Zorn, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Political Consequences of Assassination

Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: iqbal{at}psu.edu.

	Abstract

The assassination of a political leader is among the highest-profile acts of political violence, and conventional wisdom holds that such events often have substantial political, social, and economic effects on states. We investigate the extent to which the assassination of a head of state affects political stability through an analysis of all assassinations of heads of state between 1952 and 1997. We examine the political consequences of assassination by assessing the levels of political unrest, instability, and civil war in states that experience the assassination of their head of state. Our findings support the existence of an interactive relationship among assassination, leadership succession, and political turmoil: in particular, we find that assassinations’ effects on political instability are greatest in systems in which the process of leadership succession is informal and unregulated.

First published on February 26, 2008, doi:10.1177/0022002707310855

Journal of Conflict Resolution 2008;52:385.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?