Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Data Set
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0022002708314221v1
52/3/343    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

The Dynamics of Reciprocity, Accountability, and Credibility

Patrick T. Brandt1, Michael Colaresi2*, and John R. Freeman3

1 School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas
2 Department of Political Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing
3 Department of Political Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: colaresi{at}msu.edu.


   Abstract
Do public opinion dynamics play an important role in understanding conflict trajectories between democratic governments and other rival groups? The authors interpret several theories of opinion dynamics as competing clusters of contemporaneous causal links connoting reciprocity, accountability, and credibility. They translate these clusters into four distinct Bayesian structural time series models fit to events data from the Israeli–Palestinian conflict with variables for U.S. intervention and Jewish public opinion about prospects for peace. A credibility model, allowing Jewish public opinion to influence U.S., Palestinian, and Israeli behavior within a given month, fits best. More pacific Israeli opinion leads to more immediate Palestinian hostility toward Israelis. This response's direction suggests a negative feedback mechanism in which low-level conflict is maintained and momentum toward either all-out war or dramatic peace is slowed. In addition, a forecasting model including Jewish public opinion is shown to forecast ex ante better than a model without this variable.

First published on April 1, 2008, doi:10.1177/0022002708314221

Journal of Conflict Resolution 2008;52:343.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
POLIT ANALHome page
P. T. Brandt and J. R. Freeman
Modeling Macro-Political Dynamics
Political Analysis, April 1, 2009; 17(2): 113 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]