|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
A Violent Future? Political Risk Insurance Markets and Violence Forecasts
Nathan M. Jensen1*
and
Daniel J. Young2
1 Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis
2 Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: njensen{at}wustl.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
There is a substantial literature that has linked past acts of violence to investment. In this article, we argue that the appropriate mechanism linking violence to investment is investor perceptions of risk, in which forward-looking investors attempt to predict the likelihood of future political violence. We take advantage of a new data source—the price paid by investors to purchase risk insurance coverage—to more accurately capture how risk is assessed in investment decision making. Building on the civil war literature, we offer a broad explanatory model of variation in violence risk in the developing world. After controlling for recent past experiences with violence, we find that wealth and democracy significantly affect the perception of risk, whereas demographic factors and natural resource endowments have limited, if any, influence.
First published on May 13, 2008, doi:10.1177/0022002708316744
Journal of Conflict Resolution 2008;52:527.
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2008
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
