Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Conflict Resolution
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Data Set
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0022002708330388v1
53/2/234    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horowitz, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

The Spread of Nuclear Weapons and International Conflict: Does Experience Matter?

Michael Horowitz*

Department of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: horom{at}sas.upenn.edu.


   Abstract
This article evaluates whether the length of time states have nuclear weapons influences their behavior and the behavior of opponents in militarized disputes. Using multiple statistical models and illustrative cases, the article shows that, while acquiring nuclear weapons makes states significantly more likely to reciprocate militarized challenges and have their challenges reciprocated, over time, the effect reverses. In contrast to a static understanding of nuclear weapons, this variation in outcomes over time highlights the difficulties presented by nuclear proliferation.

First published on February 10, 2009, doi:10.1177/0022002708330388

Journal of Conflict Resolution 2009;53:234.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. Fuhrmann
Taking a Walk on the Supply Side: The Determinants of Civilian Nuclear Cooperation
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2009; 53(2): 181 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
E. Gartzke and D.-J. Jo
Bargaining, Nuclear Proliferation, and Interstate Disputes
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2009; 53(2): 209 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
K. Beardsley and V. Asal
Winning with the Bomb
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2009; 53(2): 278 - 301.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. Kroenig
Importing the Bomb: Sensitive Nuclear Assistance and Nuclear Proliferation
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2009; 53(2): 161 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
A. H. Montgomery and S. D. Sagan
The Perils of Predicting Proliferation
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2009; 53(2): 302 - 328.
[Abstract] [PDF]