• Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or My Tools.
Impact Factor:1.687 | Ranking:International Relations 15 out of 86 | Political Science 30 out of 163
Source:2016 Release of Journal Citation Reports, Source: 2015 Web of Science Data

Cognitive Heuristics and American Security Policy

  1. Nancy Kanwisher
    1. University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Flawed arguments often recur in debates on U.S. security policy long after their weaknesses have been exposed. In this article I argue that certain political misconceptions and fallacies resist counterargument because they are reinforced by particular reasoning shortcuts known as “cognitive heuristics.” Although heuristics save time and mental work, they can lead to error because they are based on violable assumptions. I discuss seven different cognitive heuristics and the particular security fallacies they perpetuate — from the domino theory to the idea that deterrence requires force matching. Finally, the scope and limitations of such psychological explanations will be discussed.

| Table of Contents